The way to get a high Quality Website on Low Price

Brought to you by a Pakistani Non-Profit Organization which aims to Make each person and business in Pakistan can be Reachable worldwide easily.

Share What You Think

Your Thoughts Important To Us, so let us know, we'll bring it to you by this site.

Looking for Sources to spend - so let us find you work easy like fun for you

there're hug of jobs around the world. Jobs doesn't mean a hard work for whole of your time with low income

Keep your Mind and memory Updated. and share what you learnt and thinking

there're are updataed data about everything in Article. you may Also share your comments and your articles in your own language on this websitesite.

We are working on this site still

We are working on this site still

Tuesday, 13 November 2018


Image result for asma hadeed twitterAsima Hadeed is PTI MNA?
Yes she is PTI MNA. Saboot link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asma_Hadeed

Asima realy talked about israel ?
Yes she did. See my page:
fb.com/inaamEnaam


WikiPedia

Asma Hadeed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Asma Hadeed
Member of the National Assembly of Pakistan
Assumed office
13 August 2018
ConstituencyReserved seat for women
Personal details
NationalityPakistani
Political partyPakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
RelativesAyesha Khan (daughter-in-law)[1]
Asma Hadeed is a Pakistani politician who has been a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan since August 2018.

Political career[edit]

She was elected to the National Assembly of Pakistan as a candidate of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on a reserved seat for women from Punjab in Pakistani general election, 2018.[2]
In November 2018, she advocated for better ties between Pakistan and Israel in a speech on the floor of the National Assembly.[3][4]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up^ "Aisha Khan's mother-in-law Asma Qadeer becomes PTI MNA"www.pakistantoday.com.pk. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
  2. Jump up^ Reporter, The Newspaper's Staff (12 August 2018). "List of MNAs elected on reserved seats for women, minorities"DAWN.COM. Retrieved 12 August 2018.
  3. Jump up^ "Did PTI MNA submit a resolution to recognize Israel? The real story behind fake news"Daily Pakistan Global. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
  4. Jump up^ "VIDEO: PTI MNA calls for ties with Israel"www.pakistantoday.com.pk. Retrieved 13 November 2018.

Friday, 9 November 2018

اسرائیلی طیارے کی مبینہ آمد پر حکومت کی تردید لیکن پائلٹ نے ایسا بیان جاری کر دیا کہ نیا تنازع کھڑا ہو گیا


راولپنڈی(نیوز ڈیسک)تقریبا دو ہفتے قبل اسرائیلی طیارے کی مبینہ پاکستان آمد پر ملک میں ہنگامہ برپا ہوگیا تھا جس کے بعد حکومت کی جانب سے تردید کی گئی تاہم یہ مرُدہ اک بار پھر سے اٹھ کھڑا ہوا ہے ۔ فصیلات کے مطابق مڈل ایسٹ آئی نامی ویب سائٹ نے دعویٰ کیاہے کہ
پاکستان کے ایئر پورٹ حکام نے اس بات کی تصدیق کی ہے کہ اسرائیلی طیارہ پاکستان کی سرزمین پر لینڈ کیا ہے ۔حکومت کی جانب سے مسلسل تردید کی جاتی رہی ہے تاہم اس کے برعکس پائلٹس اور نور خان ایئر بیس کے ملازمین کا کہناہے کہ انہوں نے راولپنڈی کے ایئر پورٹ پر طیارہ اترتاہو ا دیکھا ہے ۔ س وقت پاکستانی میڈیامیں اسرائیلی طیارے کی لینڈنگ کا ہنگامہ برپا تھا تو اس سے اگلے ہی دن یہ 25 اکتوبر کو یہ خبر آ گئی کہ اسرائیلی وزیراعظم نیتن یاہو اچانک اومان کے دورہ پر پہنچ گئے ہیں ۔جس کے باعث ہر طرف چہ مگوئیاں شروع ہو گئیں ۔ مڈل ایسٹ آئی کی جانب سے دعویٰ کیا گیاہے کہ ایک پائلٹ نے نام نہ ظاہر کرنے کی شرط پر بتایا ہے کہ ”24 اکتوبر کو بزجٹ کا طیارہ میرے لینڈ کرنے سے قبل ہی راولپنڈی کی نور خان ایئر بیس پر اترا تھا ۔“غیر ملکی خبر رساں اداے کے مطابق ایئر بیس پر موجود تین رکنی سٹاف نے پائلٹ کے موقف کی تصدیق کی ہے اور ان میں سے ایک کا کہناتھا کہ انہوں نے ایک گاڑی آتی ہوئی دیکھی جو کہ جہاز کے قریب رکی اور اس میںسے وہ ایک وفد کو اپنے ساتھ بٹھا کر لے گئی اور پھر کئی گھنٹوں کے بعد وہ گاڑی واپس ایئر پورٹ پر آئی ۔
تاہم یہاں پر سوال یہ کھڑا ہوتا ہے کہ وہ طیارہ پاکستان کرنے کیلئے آیا کیا تھا جبکہ پاکستان اور اسرائیل کے درمیان کوئی بھی سفارتی تعلقات نہیں ہیں ۔ پاکستان میں یہ ہنگامہ اس وقت برپاہوا جس وقت اسرائیل کے تحقیقاتی صحافی ’ ایوی سکارف ‘ نے ٹویٹر پر پیغام جاری کرتے ہوئے دعویٰ کیا کہ پاکستان میں اسرائیل کا طیارہ لینڈ کیا ہے ۔ جس کے بعد پاکستانی حکومت کی جانب سے تردید بھی کی گئی تاہم پاکستان سول ایوی ایشن کی تردید کے بعد ایوی سکارف ایک مرتبہ پھر میدان میں آئے اور انہوں نے جہازوں کی ٹریکنگ کرنے والی ویب سائٹ سے سکرین شاٹس لے کر شیئر کیے اور نئے سوالات کھڑے کر دیئے ۔ ایوی سکارف کی جانب سے دعویٰ کیا گیا کہ طیارے نے تل ابیب سے رات آٹھ بجے اڑان بھری اور وہ 24 تاریخ کو اومان پہنچا جہاں سے اس نے نیا فلائٹ کوڈ حاصل کیا اور پھر اسلام آباد کی طرف رخ کرتے ہوئے اڑان جاری رکھی لیکن کچھ ہی دیر کے بعد وہ میپ سے غائب ہو گیا تاہم دس گھنٹوں کے بعد وہ طیارہ دوبارہ ٹریکنگ میں آیا اور اومان کی جانب اڑ رہا تھا ۔

The statements made by Muhammad Idrees (CW1) and Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) before the trial court revealed that the alleged blasphemy had been committed by the Christian appellant after her Muslim co-workers had insulted the appellant’s religion and had injured her religious sensibilities only because she believed in and was a follower of Jesus Christ. According to the Holy Qur’an a Muslim’s faith is not complete till he believes in all the Holy Prophets and Messengers of Almighty Allah including Jesus Christ (Isa son of Maryam) (Peace Be Upon Him) and all the revealed Holy Books of Almighty Allah including the Holy Bible. From that perspective insulting the appellant’s religion by her Muslim co-workers was no less blasphemous. — Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Senior Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan[84]

This is a good article. Follow the link for more information.

Asia Bibi blasphemy case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Asia Bibi v. The State
Emblem of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.svg
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
DecidedOctober 2018
Transcript(s)Judgment
Case history
Appealed fromCourt of Sessions at Sheikhapura
Appealed toLahore High Court
(rejected 16 October 2014)
Subsequent action(s)Supreme Court of Pakistan
Judgement of Courts below reversed. 
Case opinions
Decision byMian Saqib Nisar
ConcurrenceAsif Saeed Khosa
Keywords
The Asia Bibi blasphemy case involves Pakistani Christian woman Aasiya Noreen (Urduآسیہ نورین‎ – Āsiyaah Naurīn[ˈɑːsiɑː nɔːˈriːn], born c. 1971;[1] commonly known as آسیہ بی بی‬ Āsia Bibī), who was convicted of blasphemy by a Pakistani court and was sentenced to death by hanging in 2010.[2] In October 2018, the Supreme Court of Pakistan acquitted her based on insufficient evidence,[3] though she will not be allowed to leave Pakistan until the verdict has been reviewed,[4] a process that can take years.[5]
In June 2009, Noreen was accused of blasphemy after an argument with co-workers while harvesting berries.[6][7] She was subsequently arrested and imprisoned. In November 2010, a Sheikhupura judge sentenced her to death by hanging. The verdict was upheld by Lahore High Court and received worldwide attention. Various petitions for her release were created by organisations aiding persecuted Christians such as Voice of the Martyrs,[8][9] including one that received 400,000 signatures, and Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis called for the charges to be dismissed.[10] She received less sympathy from her neighbors and Islamic religious leaders in the country, some of whom adamantly called for her to be executed. Minorities minister Shahbaz Bhatti and Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer were both assassinated for advocating on her behalf and opposing the blasphemy laws.[11][12] Noreen's family went into hiding after receiving death threats, some of which threatened to kill Noreen if released from prison.[13] Muslim cleric Maulana Yousaf Qureshi announced a bounty of 500,000 Pakistani rupees (₨) to anyone who would kill her.[14]
On 31 October 2018, the Supreme Court of Pakistan acquitted Noreen[3] citing "material contradictions and inconsistent statements of the witnesses" which "cast a shadow of doubt on the prosecution’s version of facts."[15] The decision sparked protests headed by Islamist parties in major cities of the country.[16][17][18] The decision was praised by human rights groups and those advocating on behalf of Christian minorities, such as International Christian ConcernOpen Doors, and Aid to the Church in Need.[18][19]
On 2 November 2018 however, the Government of Pakistan signed an agreement with the Tehreek-e-Labbaik political party (TLP), which was leading the protests; this agreement barred Asia Bibi from leaving the country.[5][20][21][22][23] This agreement between the Government of Pakistan and Tehreek-e-Labbaik has led to "allegations [that] the government was capitulating to extremists".[24][20][25] The governments of ItalyCanada, and other Western countries, are currently working to help Asia Bibi leave Pakistan. On 7 November 2018, Asia Bibi was released from the New Jail for Women in Multan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied that she had left the country and said that she remains in Pakistan.
The blasphemy law in Pakistan has resulted in the killing of over 60 people due to accusations, as well as dozens of communal attacks which have taken place against religious minorities on the pretext of blasphemy,[15][26] and has been used by individuals as a tool for revenge against other people.[27][28] Noreen was the first woman in Pakistan to be sentenced to death for blasphemy, and would have been the first person in Pakistan to be executed for blasphemy under the current law.[29][30]

Background and arrest

Aasiya Noreen was born and raised in Ittan Wali, a small, rural village in the Sheikhupura District of Punjab, Pakistan,[31][32] thirty miles outside of Lahore.[33] Poor Christians in the district, and elsewhere in Pakistan, often have lower-class occupations such as cleaning and sweeping.[33] Noreen, who is a Catholic,[34] worked as a farmhand in Sheikhupura to support her family.[34] She married Ashiq Masih, a brick laborer who had three children from a previous marriage, and had two more children with him.[35][36] Noreen and her family were the only Christians in the village.[13] Before her incarceration, she had been repeatedly urged by her fellow workers to convert to Islam.[37]
In June 2009, Noreen was harvesting falsa berries with a group of other women farmhands in a field in Sheikhupura.[34] She was asked at one point to fetch water from a nearby well;[30] she complied but stopped to take a drink with an old metal cup she had found lying next to the well.[38] A neighbor of Noreen, Musarat, who had been involved in a running feud with Noreen's family about some property damage,[1] saw her and angrily told her that it was forbidden for a Christian to drink water from the same utensil from which Muslims drink, and that some of the other workers considered her to be unclean because she was a Christian, referring to the caste system in Pakistan.[6][7] Noreen recounts that when they made derogatory statements about Christianity and demanded that she convert to Islam, she responded, "I believe in my religion and in Jesus Christ, who died on the cross for the sins of mankind. What did your Prophet Mohammed ever do to save mankind? And why should it be me that converts instead of you?"[38][39] An argument ensued.[40]
A mob came to her house, beating her and members of her family before she was taken away by the police.[30] The police initiated an investigation about her remarks, resulting in her arrest under Section 295 C of the Pakistan Penal Code.[29]
In an interview with CNN, local police officer Muhammad Ilyas claimed that Noreen said that "the Quran is fake and your prophet remained in bed for one month before his death because he had worms in his ears and mouth. He married Khadija just for money and after looting her kicked her out of the house".[41] Village Imam Qari Muhammad Salim, to whom Noreen's coworkers reported the alleged blasphemy, claimed that Noreen confessed to him and apologized.[41] On the other hand, the Asian Human Rights Commission published a letter that stated:[42]
Five days after the incident, a local Muslim leader, Qari Salem, jumped into the matter and pressured some people in the area to claim that she committed blasphemy. When finding no way to get Ms. Bibi to confess, Salem used the loudspeakers of the mosque, as other Muslim leaders usually do in the cases of alleged blasphemy acts, to spread the news of blasphemy and instigate the people of the locality to punish the alleged blasphemer. The people of the locality beat her severely in the presence of her children.[42]
She was subsequently imprisoned for over a year before being formally charged.[43]

Prosecution and imprisonment

Noreen denied that she had committed blasphemy and said that she had been accused by her neighbor to "settle an old score".[13][43][44] In November 2010, Muhammed Naveed Iqbal, a judge at the court of Sheikhupura, Punjab, sentenced her to death by hanging. Additionally, a fine of the equivalent of $1,100[clarification needed] was imposed.[45]
With the verdict, she became the first woman condemned to death in Pakistan on blasphemy charges.[35] Noreen described the day of her sentencing as follows:
I cried alone, putting my head in my hands. I can no longer bear the sight of people full of hatred, applauding the killing of a poor farm worker. I no longer see them, but I still hear them, the crowd who gave the judge a standing ovation, saying: "Kill her, kill her! Allahu Akbar!" The court house is invaded by a euphoric horde who break down the doors, chanting: "Vengeance for the holy prophet. Allah is great!" I was then thrown like an old rubbish sack into the van... I had lost all humanity in their eyes.[46]
Noreen's husband, Ashiq Masih, 51 years old at the time,[47] announced that he planned to appeal the verdict, which has to be upheld by the Lahore High Court.[29] A month later, Salmaan Taseer, the governor of Punjab who investigated the affair for the President Asif Ali Zardari, stated that Noreen would most likely be pardoned if the High Court did not suspend the sentence.[48] Zardari was poised to grant pardon, but the High Court issued a stay order against potential Presidential pardon, which remains in force to date.[49][50] Court transcripts show numerous inconsistencies in the evidence presented and reporters say they dare not repeat Bibi's testimony lest they also be accused of blasphemy.[51]
Noreen was put in solitary confinement in an 8-by-10-foot (2.4 m × 3.0 m) cell[8] without windows at the Lahore prison.[31] Before his assassination, Taseer visited her at the jail several times with his wife, Aamna, and daughter, Shehrbano,[33] though Pakistani court officials later ruled that she could be visited only by her husband and lawyer.[31] Khalid Sheikh, the prison superintendent, said that while he wanted her to be treated "like any other prisoner", she had to be kept away from other inmates for her own well-being,[52] as other individuals accused of blasphemy had been killed while in prison.[13][53] Out of concern that she could be poisoned, prison officials began giving Noreen raw materials to cook her own food.[54] The Masihi Foundation, a human rights group, described her physical condition as "very frail", and her health was reported to be in decline due to poor living conditions at the jail.[43][55] She has also been threatened by other inmates and subjected to physical abuse from prison guards.[37][56]
According to Human Rights Watch, Noreen's situation is not unusual.[28] Though no one has been executed for blasphemy yet in Pakistan,[57] the accused often remain imprisoned for a long time while the case is being processed.[56] In May 2014, Noreen's appeal hearing was delayed for the fifth time.[58]

Local reaction

Noreen's conviction led to divided opinions on the blasphemy laws and drew strong reactions from the public. Pakistani Human Rights Watch researcher Ali Dayan Hasan said, "The law creates this legal infrastructure which is then used in various informal ways to intimidate, coerce, harass and persecute."[59] He further described the law as "discriminatory and abusive".[13] Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer and Pakistan's Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti both publicly supported Noreen, with the latter saying, "I will go to every knock for justice on her behalf and I will take all steps for her protection."[13] She also received support from Pakistani political scientist Rasul Baksh Rais and local priest Samson Dilawar.[35] The imprisonment of Noreen left Christians and other minorities in Pakistan feeling vulnerable, and liberal Muslims were also unnerved by her sentencing.[52]
The general population was less sympathetic towards Noreen. Several signs were erected in Sheikhupura and other rural areas declaring support for the blasphemy laws, including one that called for Noreen to be beheaded.[52] Mohammad Saleem, a member of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan party, organized a demonstration in Rawalpindi and led a small crowd chanting, "Hang her, hang her."[35] In December 2010, a month after Noreen's conviction, Maulana Yousaf Qureshi, the Muslim cleric of the Mohabaat Khan Mosque in Peshawar, announced a 500,000 Pakistani rupee bounty (the equivalent of about US$5,800 in December 2010) to anyone who would kill her.[14][31][29] One survey reported that around 10 million Pakistanis had said that they would be willing to personally kill her out of either religious conviction or for the reward.[31] The village mosque in Ittan Wali was reportedly indifferent towards Noreen's plight; its imam, who helped register the case against her, Qari Mohammed Salim, stated that he had wept for joy on learning that she had been sentenced to death and threatened that some people would "take the law into their own hands" should she be pardoned or released.[13] However, journalist Julie McCarthy suggested that the country's "more peaceful majority views" had been overshadowed by the more vocal fundamentalists.[35]
Noreen's family has received threats and has gone into hiding.[13] Ashiq, her husband, stated that he was afraid to let their children go outside. He also expressed concern about how Noreen would be kept safe should she be released, saying, "No one will let her live. The mullahs are saying they will kill her when she comes out."[13] Her family declined to leave the country while she remained in prison, but Italy, France, and Spain all offered to grant her and her family asylum in the event of her release.[38]

Assassinations of Taseer and Bhatti

On 4 January 2011, at Kohsar Market of Islamabad, governor of Punjab Salmaan Taseer, was assassinated by Malik Mumtaz Hussein Qadri, a 26-year-old member of his security team, because of his defence of Noreen and opposition to the blasphemy law. Mumtaz Qadri was sentenced to death for the assassination and hanged on 29 February 2016. Taseer was outspoken in his criticism of the law and the verdict in Noreen's case. The next day, thousands turned up for the governor's funeral in Lahore in spite of warnings by the Taliban and some clerics,[40] while a portion of the Pakistani population also praised Qadri as a hero;[60] thousands of Sunni Muslimsrallied in support of the blasphemy laws in Pakistan after the murder,[33] and 500 Barelvi clerics prohibited their followers from sending condolences to the family of Taseer.[61] This resulted in concerns that the public was becoming tolerant of extremists.[61]
Prison officials said that Noreen "wept inconsolably" on learning of Taseer's assassination while repeatedly saying, "That man came here and he sacrificed his life for me."[52] Father Andrew Nisari, a senior Catholic Spokesperson in Lahore, described the situation as "utter chaos".[52] Seven months later, Taseer's 28-year-old son, Shahbaz, was kidnapped.[62] Shahbaz Taseer was later found or released in March 2016, and he returned to Lahore on 9 March after five years in captivity.[63]
Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti said that he was first threatened with death in June 2010 when he was told that he would be beheaded if he attempted to change the blasphemy laws. In response, he told reporters that he was "committed to the principle of justice for the people of Pakistan" and willing to die fighting for Noreen's release.[13] On 2 March 2011, Bhatti was shot dead by gunmen who ambushed his car near his residence in Islamabad, presumably because of his position on the blasphemy laws. He had been the only Christian member of Pakistan's cabinet.[61]

International response

Noreen's death sentence drew international outrage[64] and strong condemnation from non-governmental organizations defending persecuted Christians, as well as human rights groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch who saw the blasphemy laws as a form of religious persecution and called for them to be abolished.[8][35][13] Pope Benedict XVI publicly called for clemency for Noreen.[59] In his statement, he described his "spiritual closeness" with Noreen and urged that the "human dignity and fundamental rights of everyone in similar situations" be respected.[65][66]
Her case also achieved extensive media coverage, and American journalist John L. Allen, Jr. wrote that she is "almost certainly the most famous illiterate Punjabi farm worker and mother of five on the planet".[34] According to Allen, she has become a celebrity among Christian activists, an unusual instance when cases of discrimination against Christian minorities typically receive little attention in the press.[34] A number of campaigns have been organized to protest her imprisonment through online petitions, Twitter trends, and concerts. Ooberfuse, a Christian pop band based in the United Kingdom collaborated with the British Pakistani Christian Association,[67] and released a song titled "Free Asia Bibi" with a music video that included "a disturbing visual portrayal of the squalid prison conditions where Bibi is being held".[50] She has also been the subject of books and documentaries.[31]
One petition created by the Voice of the Martyrs, an organisation aiding persecuted Christians, received over 400,000 signatures from individuals from over 100 countries.[8] Another petition, organised by the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), obtained over 200,000 signatures and called for America's aid to Pakistan(said to be cumulatively eight billion dollars) to stop whilst persecution of minorities is allowed in that country.[68]
Umar Al-Qadri, an Islamic cleric in Ireland, called for Noreen's release and stated he would back organisations wishing the same, holding that, "Asia Bibi is a case where the lady is denying that she committed blasphemy, and based on that it would be sufficient for the court to release her, but unfortunately that particular law, the blasphemy law in Pakistan, does not represent the true Islamic teaching".[69]

Appeals

On 16 October 2014, the Lahore High Court dismissed Noreen's appeal and upheld her death sentence.[70] On 20 November 2014, her husband appealed to the President of Pakistan for clemency.[71] On 24 November 2014, her lawyer appealed to the Supreme Court of Pakistan.[72]
On 22 July 2015, the Supreme Court suspended Bibi's death sentence for the duration of the appeals process.[73][74] In November 2015, Bibi's lead attorney, Naeem Shakir, announced that, after two postponements in 2015, the Lahore High Court would hear an appeal in Bibi's case on 26 March 2016.[75] The hearing was rescheduled for 13 October 2016, but on that morning when it was the turn of the case "Asia Bibi against the state", one of the three members of the bench of judges of that section – Iqbal Hameedur Rehman[76] – refused to be part of the bench[77], which led to the postponement of the hearing to an undetermined date. The Judge later resigned in a handwritten letter addressed to Mamnoon Hussain, the President of Pakistan, without stating any specific reasons for his resignation.[76] On 26 April 2017, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar declined a request for the early hearing of the case of Asia Bibi in the first week of June made by her lawyer Saiful Malook.[78]

Supreme Court acquittal

On 8 October 2018, a three-judge bench comprising CJP Mian Saqib Nisar, Justice Asif Saeed Khosa and Justice Mazhar Alam reserved its judgement on the final legal appeal.[79] On 31 October 2018, the Supreme Court in a 56-page detailed judgement authored by CJP Nisar, with a separate concurrent opinion note from Justice Khosa, acquitted Asia Bibi of blasphemy charges after accepting her 2015 appeal against her sentence.[80][81] [82][83] The court also ruled that "she was free to go, if not wanted in connection with any other case".[3] In his verdict, Judge Asif Saeed Khan Khosa noted:[84]
The statements made by Muhammad Idrees (CW1) and Muhammad Amin Bukhari, SP (Investigation) (PW6) before the trial court revealed that the alleged blasphemy had been committed by the Christian appellant after her Muslim co-workers had insulted the appellant’s religion and had injured her religious sensibilities only because she believed in and was a follower of Jesus Christ. According to the Holy Qur’an a Muslim’s faith is not complete till he believes in all the Holy Prophets and Messengers of Almighty Allah including Jesus Christ (Isa son of Maryam) (Peace Be Upon Him) and all the revealed Holy Books of Almighty Allah including the Holy Bible. From that perspective insulting the appellant’s religion by her Muslim co-workers was no less blasphemous. — Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Senior Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan[84]
The final judgment said that one of Noreen's accusers violated the Ashtiname of Muhammad, a "covenant made by Muhammad with Christians in the seventh century but still valid today".[15] Judge Khosa also stated that the two women who made accusations against Noreen “had no regard for the truth” and that the claim that she blasphemed Muhammad in public was a “concoction incarnate”.[85] The Supreme Court of Pakistan's ruling cited “material contradictions and inconsistent statements of the witnesses” that “cast a shadow of doubt on the prosecution’s version of facts.”[15]
Asia Noreen was reading the Christian Bible when she heard the news, upon which exclaimed "I can't believe what I am hearing, will I go out now? Will they let me out, really? ... I just don't know what to say, I am very happy, I can't believe it."[86][84] Noreen's daughter Eisham Ashiq, said that the news of the acquittal was “the most wonderful moment in my life ... I want to hug my mother and then celebrate with my family. I am grateful to God for listening to our prayers.”[87]

Domestic response

In response to the verdict, Islamist groups protested in the streets of Pakistan, "blocking roads and damaging infrastructure".[17][16][88] The Supreme Court decision sparked protests in Lahore, IslamabadKarachiPeshawar[89] and MultanJUI-F chief Fazal-ur-Rehman called for "peaceful" protests stating that Bibi's release was "not acceptable at any cost". Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) chief Khadim Hussain Rizvi and Jamaat-i-Ahle Hadees also called for protests.[90] Protesters belonging to the TLP party said traffic will "remain blocked until Asia Bibi is hanged."[88] and Islamabad's main highway was blocked by "approximately a thousand club-wielding demonstrators".[84] Muhammad Afzal Qadri, a TLP co-founder, Afzal Qadri also called for the death of the three Supreme Court justices involved in hearing Bibi's appeal, stating "The Chief Justice and two others deserve to be killed ... Either their security guards, their drivers, or their chefs should kill them."[91][92] The Red Zoneof Islamabad was sealed off from the public in order to keep protesters away, with paramilitary forces being deployed to this end.[93] Prime Minister Imran Khan in a televised address to the nation on the Asia Bibi verdict, issued a stark warning to the groups that were agitating against the decision. He concluded his address stating, "do not take the state to a point where it has no option but to take action".[94][95] On 1 November, the National Highways and Motorway Police advised commuters to "refrain from travelling on motorways and national highways" on account of "the law & order situation across the country".[96][97] Christian schools in Lahore "closed indefinitely" for safety reasons following the protests.[98] The government of Pakistan also shut down mobile phone networks on 2 November.[99]
Before the announcement of the acquittal on 31 October, Christians in Pakistan fasted and prayed.[100] Cardinal Joseph CouttsRoman Catholic Archbishop of Karachi, prayed that "there may not be a violent reaction from the extremists".[101]
Saif-ul-Mulook, the lawyer who defended Asia Noreen, states that "his life has not been the same since; he rarely socialises, lives in a constant state of hypervigilance and has been inundated with threats."[102] The South China Morning Post and Christian Today reported that he is now an "easy target" for extremists.[11][102] On 3 November 2018, he was reported as "having fled" the country,[103] to the Netherlands.[104] Saif-ul-Mulook maintains that the United Nations "kept me for three days and then put me on a plane against my wishes" as he "refused to leave the country without ensuring that his client was out of prison."[105]

International response

The decision was praised by human rights groups and organizations advocating for persecuted Christians, such as International Christian Concern, Open Doors, and Aid to the Church in Need.[18] CEO of Open Doors David Curry, said: "We are breathing a sigh of relief today … as these charges stemmed from her Christian identity as well as false accusations against her. We are hopeful that Pakistan will now take additional steps to offer religious freedom and basic human rights throughout the country."[15] Omar Waraich, Amnesty International's Deputy South Asia Director, described the ruling as a "landmark verdict".[80] Neville Kyrke-Smith of Aid to the Church in Need proclaimed with respect to Asia Noreen's acquital: “Today is like the dawn of new hope for oppressed minorities.”[19] The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan issued a statement on November 1 welcoming the acquittal, stating that "From a human rights perspective, the Supreme Court’s detailed judgment underlines several of the most problematic aspects of applying the blasphemy laws. The presumption of innocence is too easily buried by moral outrage, which invariably pits the vulnerable and underprivileged against those in majority."[106]
Olav Fykse Tveit, general secretary of the World Council of Churches, "received with joy" news of the acquittal, stating: "We celebrate her acquittal and release together with her, her family and community ... The WCC has repeatedly called for justice for Asia Bibi, convicted 8 years ago on charges resulting from a village argument in which she was accused by her neighbours of blasphemy. ... WCC therefore appeals once again to the Government of Pakistan to review its blasphemy laws, to curb their abuse, and to eliminate discriminatory bias against religious minorities."[107]
 United Nations: UN Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq said that because of the organization's long-standing opposition to the death penalty, it "would welcome this latest development".[108][109]
 United KingdomTheresa May, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, stated that "the news would be welcomed around the world, and the UK was committed to the global abolition of the death penalty."[110]
 United States: The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) Chair Tenzin Dorjee lauded the ruling, saying “The case of Asia Bibi illustrates the extent to which blasphemy laws can be exploited to target minority communities. These laws seek to protect entire religions rather than the individual, as should be the case under international human rights standards. It is deeply troubling that Bibi’s case even reached this level, where she almost became the first person in Pakistan’s history to be executed for the crime of blasphemy.”[111]
 FranceMarine Le Pen, president of the National Rally in France called on her government to grant Asia Noreen asylum.[112]
The European Centre for Law and Justice lauded the ruling as well, and advocated the "abolition of the crime of blasphemy in Pakistan".[113]
Several countries including France and Spain have offered Asia Noreen asylum.[82][102]

Bar from leaving Pakistan

On 2 November 2018, the Government of Pakistan under the administration of Imran Khan and the Islamist Tehreek-e-Labbaik political party, which encouraged the protests against Asia Bibi, came to an agreement that barred Asia Bibi from leaving the country, in addition to releasing Tehreek-e-Labbaik protesters.[5][20][21][22][23]Noor-ul-Haq Qadri, the religious affairs minister, and Muhammad Basharat Raja, Punjab's minister for law, signed the agreement on behalf of the government.[114][115]The deal includes expediting a motion in the court to place Asia Noreen on Pakistan's no fly list, known officially as the Exit Control List (ECL).[20][5] Pakistani authorities will not release Asia Noreen until the "Supreme Court makes a final review of its verdict" as "Ghulam Mustafa, the lawyer representing a provincial cleric in Punjab who had filed the initial blasphemy charges against Bibi, petitioned the Supreme Court requesting that the judges review her acquittal."[4] Similar reviews have taken years to process.[5] The TLP agreed to end its three-day protest sit-ins across the country and its leaders asked the protesters to disperse peacefully.[116]
A plane from the United Kingdom reportedly arrived to pick up Asia Noreen after her acquittal but returned without her, as the Pakistani government currently still has her under detention as a result of the agreement with Tehreek-e-Labbaik.[117]
Wilson Chowdhry, chairman of the British Pakistani Christian Association (BPCA), stated that "Placing Asia Bibi on the ECL is like signing her death warrant".[118]
This agreement between the Government of Pakistan and Tehreek-e-Labbaik has led to "allegations [that] the government was capitulating to extremists".[24] Pakistani Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry responded to these allegations, saying that "We had two options: either to use force, and when you use force people can be killed. That is not something a state should do... We tried negotiations and (in) negotiations you take something and you leave something."[24]
Asia Noreen's lawyer Saif-ul-Mulook called the agreement between the Government of Pakistan and the Islamists "painful", stating that "They cannot even implement an order of the country's highest court".[119] Feeling that his life was threatened, Mulook fled to Europe in order "to stay alive as I still have to fight the legal battle for Asia Bibi."[119] BPCA chairman Wilson Chowdhry likewise stated that “I am not surprised that Imran Khan’s regime has caved in to extremists”.[20] Jemima Goldsmith, an ex-wife of Imran Khan, similarly "said that Pakistan’s government caved in to extremist demands to bar Asia Bibi from leaving the country", opining "Not the Naya Pakistan we’d hoped for. 3 days after a defiant & brave speech defending the judiciary, Pakistan’s gov caves in to extremist demands to bar #AsiaBibi from leaving Pak, after she was acquitted of blasphemy- effectively signing her death warrant."[25]
Ashiq Masih, the husband of Asia Noreen, appealed to President of the United States Donald Trump, as well as Theresa MayPrime Minister of the United Kingdomand Justin TrudeauPrime Minister of Canada, to "help the family leave the country" and grant them asylum.[120] He told the charity Aid to the Church in Need, an organisation that aids persecuted Christians: "Help us get out of Pakistan. We are extremely worried because our lives are in danger. We no longer have even anything to eat, because we cannot leave the house to buy food".[121]

International Reaction and Response

 EUAntonio Tajani, the President of the European Parliament, stated "The European Parliament is extremely concerned for your safety as well as your family’s, due to the violence by extremist elements in Pakistan". Tajani penned a letter to Asia Bibi's husband, inviting his family to "Brussels or Strasbourg for a meeting about how I can concretely facilitate the release of your wife, Asia Bibi".[122]
 ItalyMatteo Salvini, the Deputy Prime Minister of Italy, stated that "I want women and children whose lives are at risk to be able to have a secure future, in our country or in other Western countries, so I will do everything humanly possible to guarantee that [for Bibi] ... It is not permissible that in 2018 someone can risk losing their life for a … hypothesis of blasphemy".[123] Salvini further stated that "Italy had nothing against the Pakistani government" but that the "enemy is violence, extremism and fanaticism".[123][124]
 CanadaChrystia Freeland, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada, stated that “It’s a very important issue, a central priority for our government ... Canada calls on Pakistan to take all measures necessary to ensure the safety and security of Asia Bibi and her family ... Canada is prepared to do everything we can and is extremely engaged in this issue.”[123]

Release

On 7 November 2018, a release order arrived at New Jail for Women in which Asia Bibi was incarcerated at in Multan.[125][126] Local news reported that she was flown to PAF Base Nur Khan and would depart the country on a charter plane to the Netherlands.[125]
However, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied the media reports that Asia Bibi has left Pakistan, stating that she is "in a safe place in Pakistan".[127][128][129]
Hafiz Shahbaz Attari of the Islamist political party Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), upon hearing the news, said that TLP members would gather in Islamabad and Rawalpindi and try to prevent her departure.[125] Another TLP leader Afzal Qadri, stated that "officials told the group that Bibi would not be allowed to leave until the Supreme Court rules on their appeal of her acquittal".[127]

Memoirs

French journalist Anne-Isabelle Tollet (fr) assisted Noreen in writing a memoir titled Blasphemy: A Memoir: Sentenced to Death over a Cup of Water (2013, ISBN 1613748892).[38] Noreen is illiterate, and Tollet was unable to visit her directly due to prison restrictions. He conducted interviews through Noreen's husband, who passed questions and answers between them. Tollet also met other members of Noreen's family, including her children and sister, and had known Shahbaz Bhatti before his assassination.[38]
In 2015, Polish filmmakers, inspired by the memoir, produced the film Uwolnić Asię Bibi (English: Freedom for Asia Bibi).[130]

Contradiction With Islamic Law

The Hanafi school of jurisprudence, which Pakistan claims to model their legal system after, does not mandate the death penalty for non-Muslims who insult the prophet Muhammad. This is even stated in al-Hidaya, a text which is taught all across Pakistan in Hanafi seminaries.[131][132] The other three Sunni Islamic schools of thought contain authoritative rulings in agreement with the Hanafi school as well.[133]
The founder of the Hanafi School, Abu Hanifa, clearly stated blasphemy by a non-Muslim under an Islamic state is not punishable by death.
If a dhimmi (protected non-Muslim under the state) insults the Holy Prophet, he will not be killed as punishment. A non-Muslim is not killed for his kufr(denying the prophet, disbelief) or shirk (polytheism). Kufr and shirk are bigger sins than insulting the prophet.
— Abu Hanifa, founder of the Hanafi School, al-Saif al-Maslool[131][134]